Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR): Design, Methods, Risks & Field Practice

Across cities and agricultural regions, falling water tables, drying rivers, and unreliable rainfall are forcing engineers to rethink how water is stored and managed. Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) allows excess surface water — from rainfall, storm runoff, or treated wastewater — to be intentionally stored underground, where evaporation losses are minimal and long-term resilience improves.

For engineers, recharge is not theory. It is a design problem. Success depends on geology, infiltration behaviour, water quality, and long-term monitoring. Poorly designed recharge schemes fail quietly through clogging, contamination, or hydraulic short-circuiting — often years after construction.

Across India, many recharge projects underperform not because of funding gaps, but because subsurface behaviour and long-term operation are poorly understood.

This guide sets out how groundwater recharge works in real field conditions, how MAR systems are selected and designed, where failures typically occur, and how engineers can implement recharge safely and at scale, with specific reference to Indian hydrogeological conditions.

Why groundwater recharge matters now for cities and agriculture

---

Rapid urban growth, expanding irrigation, and seasonal rainfall make many aquifers stressed or over-exploited. Recharging groundwater is not a stopgap — it is part of conjunctive water management that balances surface supplies with subsurface storage, reduces dependence on expensive imports, and supports ecosystems that rely on baseflow. National programs and master plans now prioritise artificial recharge as a strategic response to water security.

How groundwater recharge works: infiltration, vadose zone, and aquifer response

---

Recharge occurs when surface water infiltrates the vadose zone and percolates to the saturated zone. Three site controls matter most:

• Infiltration capacity:
  → Controls the rate at which surface water enters the subsurface; governed by soil texture, structure, surface sealing, and biological activity.
• Vadose-zone thickness and chemistry:
  → Controls residence time, attenuation of contaminants, and redox buffering before water reaches the aquifer.
• Aquifer hydraulic properties (transmissivity and storage):
  → Determine pressure response, lateral spreading of recharge water, and recoverability.

Recharge can be natural (rainfall, stream losses) or engineered (spreading basins, injection wells, soil-aquifer treatment). Technical method selection depends first on subsurface permeability and water quality.

In practice, MAR is not a single technique but a family of engineered interventions that respond differently to geology, land availability, and water quality.

Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) methods used in practice

---

Below are the most used MAR approaches, with practical notes for design and selection.

1. Spreading (infiltration) basins and ponds

Best where shallow permeable sediments exist. Design notes:

• Field permeability assessment:
  → Conduct double-ring or constant-head infiltration tests across the full basin footprint to capture spatial variability.
• Seasonal performance allowance:
  → Account for monsoon and dry-season variability by applying a 1.5–2× design safety factor.

No single MAR method is universally applicable. Basin infiltration, injection wells, and soil-aquifer treatment respond very differently to geology, land availability, and water quality. Method selection must follow hydrogeological conditions rather than administrative convenience.

2. Recharge (injection) wells

Used when surface infiltration is inadequate or land is constrained. Design notes:

• Injection capacity testing:
  → Step-test injection rates to establish sustainable operating limits without formation damage.
• Hydraulic connectivity assessment:
  → Conduct tracer tests and step-drawdown or pulse tests to establish hydraulic connection and radius of influence.
• Use screens and gravel packs as needed; monitor head build-up to prevent fracturing or saline intrusion.

3. Soil-Aquifer Treatment (SAT) with treated wastewater

SAT uses soil as a natural filter for tertiary treated effluent before aquifer entry. Design notes:

• Pilot test for hydraulic and geochemical behaviour because SAT can change redox conditions that mobilise metals.
• Include pre-treatment (sedimentation, filtration, disinfection) and staged infiltration to watch for clogging and organics removal.

4. Check dams, percolation tanks and watershed interventions

Small landscape structures slow runoff and increase local infiltration. These are low-tech, high-impact in rural and peri-urban landscapes if sited on permeable streambeds.

Engineering design checklist for groundwater recharge (step-by-step)

---

Recharge design should follow decision logic based on subsurface behaviour, not a checklist-only approach.

1. Desk study (hydrogeological context):
   → Review groundwater maps, NAQUIM/CGWB datasets, rainfall records, land use, and borehole logs.
2. Site reconnaissance: soil texture, slope, existing drains, potential contamination sources.
3. Field testing (hydraulic characterisation):
   → Perform infiltration tests, grain-size analysis, and pumping tests to quantify transmissivity and specific yield.
4. Water source audit: quantify seasonal flows and quality of donor water (stormwater, river, reclaimed wastewater).
5. Pretreatment design: sediment traps, sand filters, disinfection as required by source quality.
6. Hydraulic modelling:
   → Use MODFLOW or equivalent numerical models to estimate capture zones, head changes, and groundwater travel times.
7. Risk assessment: identify contamination pathways, arsenic/iron mobilisation potential, and legacy pollution risks.
8. Monitoring plan & regulatory compliance: baseline and sentinel wells, sampling programme and permit strategy.

Water-quality risks and technical controls

---

Common failure modes: surface clogging, mobilisation of trace elements (e.g., arsenic, iron), pathogen infiltration, and salt accumulation. Controls:

• Pretreatment systems:
  → Use settling ponds, rapid sand filters, or membrane filtration to reduce suspended solids and pathogen loading.
• Operational controls:
  → Periodic drying and scraping of basins, routine desludging of forebays, and controlled replenishment scheduling.
• Geochemical monitoring parameters:
  → Track DO, ORP, major ions, and trace elements to detect redox shifts and mobilisation risks.

Monitoring, operation and maintenance (O&M)

---

Minimum monitoring network for a pilot:

• Three nested piezometers (shallow, intermediate, deep) at the site.
• Continuous water-level logging, periodic chemistry sampling (monthly initially), and event sampling after major recharge events.
• Routine O&M activities:
  → Include forebay cleaning, filter backwash, basin surface scraping, well rehabilitation, and documentation.

India snapshot — policy and municipal practice

---

• National guidance & master plan: India’s Master Plan for Artificial Recharge and NAQUIM have created a mapped inventory and targets for large-scale recharge structures across the country. CGWB guidance remains the primary technical resource for engineers planning recharge projects.
• Municipal examples: Greater Hyderabad’s programme to construct tens of thousands of rainwater harvesting pits and convert non-functional borewells into recharge wells is a practical municipal pathway to scale recharge within a city. Local canal restoration and tank linking programmes also improve catchment-scale recharge. These actions illustrate how city agencies can combine land-use rules, infrastructure conversion, and community outreach to deliver measurable recharge.

Field pilot sequence — recommended phased approach

---

1. Pilot desk study & approvals.
2. Small pilot (1–5% of full scale): a single basin or one injection well with full monitoring.
3. Data review (3–12 months): infiltration decline, water-chemistry trends, pressure response.
4. Scale-up in phases with periodic audits and public reporting. This staged approach identifies unintended impacts early and demonstrates performance for regulators and stakeholders.

FAQ’s – Quick Answers

References or Reports

• Central Ground Water Board — Master Plan for Artificial Recharge & NAQUIM reports.
• UNESCO — Managing Aquifer Recharge: A Showcase for Resilience and Sustainability (2021).
• U.S. Geological Survey — Artificial Groundwater Recharge overview and technical methods.
• Recent municipal action — Greater Hyderabad water board rainwater pits and borewell conversion programme.